paranoia

So you fools that watch mainstream TV News.
Or maybe you are addicted to a particular cable news station and the fear that wets your underwear keeps you glued to it as much as possible.
Rightwing News(FoxNews, Sun News Network), is designed to make fun of people. To make you scared of other people(religions, race, lifestyles).
Former President Ronald Reagan(died of dementia) disposed of the 'truth in news' laws.
Prime Minister Harper is busy killing off Canadas 'truth in news' laws.
Leftwing TV news has to compete with crazy conspiracy stories on Rightwing news. Leftwing TV news then drops its standards to get higher ratings, resulting in more derp and less meaty facts.
FoxNews lost millions of viewers after the 2012 Presidential elections. FoxNews told them that a rich white billionaire was going to win guaranteed. He did not. The FoxNews cult like viewers stampeded away back into their echo chamber to scream in agony for 6 months and counting.
Sometimes it is not what the news says, but what the news does not say. The news does practice self censorship to avoid displeasing the government or police or corporation.

A paranoid population is an easily manipulated population.
An easily manipulated population is a prison where no Rights exist.


http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/04/201342312124223136.html
 US cable news fostering a climate of fear
Major news outlets have only fanned the flames of hysteria following the Boston bombings.
....
However, it nonetheless bears asking the question in response to Gregory's assertion: why should Americans - whose country possesses the most powerful military in human history and who spend more on defense than the next 13 countries combined - have to resign themselves to living in "a state of terror"? Can the actions of a disaffected teenage boy and his older brother, however heinous, be enough to terrorize a military superpower into paralysis and compel Americans to relinquish their Constitutionally-enshrined rights and freedoms?
...
In their 2010 report for Foreign Affairs, John Mueller and Mark G Stewart constructed a comparative analysis of terrorism compared to other potential causes of death to Americans. What the results showed was that the average American on an annual basis is more likely to be killed by one of their home appliances, drowning in a bathtub, or in a car accident involving a deer, than they are to be killed in a terrorist attack. This is to say nothing of the threat of ordinary violent crime, which poses a greater threat by several orders of magnitude than that of terrorist violence and continues to churn on at an industrial scale throughout the country.
....
The same establishment news organizations which peddled the hype and lies that convinced millions of Americans to fight a ruinous war against Iraq on utterly false pretenses are today attempting to convince them to submit to more government surveillance and further diminishment of their civil liberties.


So what have we learned here?
People in North America are stupid and higher TV news ratings are needed for higher profits and people refuse to defend themselves when their Rights and Freedoms are being removed for the military/industrial complexes profits.

Oh so you have not noticed all that military hardware that your local police force has?
Armored vehicles.
Fake cell tower in a briefcase to collect all cell phone i.d.'s in an area(protest or just because).
Cameras with facial recognition.
What looks like a satellite dish on a truck is a 'focusable noise speaker' that can damage hearing forever.
Automated license plate recognition computer in the police car that is recording every license plate it sees.
Toll gates that also collect data on every vehicle that passes through them.
RoadBlocks that look for signs of criminal activity instead of looking for drunk drivers. Oh you must be a terrorist because of those mystery packages in the back seat that are gift wrapped. All done by the officer who can't seem to remember what the law says in regards to innocence before automatic accusation and search for guilt.
Then there are those security guards who forget that they are not the police and they have to abide by the same laws as the rest of you.

The police, corporations and politicians who are exempt from some of the laws that you have to abide by.  Also known as a multi-level legal system that has less laws for those who are in power. That would seem to be a violation of law, to not treat all people equally at all times. Discrimination. Abuse of power. Bribery under the guise of lobbying. Obstruction of justice. Malicious prosecution. Crimes against Humanity.

------------------

Stick to Leftwing Online news sites.
Stay away from those Rightwing conspiracy sites that are there to make a profit and who cares how many people die because of their crazy articles warping peoples views of outsiders.

---------------------

Beware of propaganda efforts by the news.
Where they display news in a way to shape peoples thinking to be that of a minor few people who expect large profits by manipulating the population.


-----------------------------

Do some reading on Cults and the people of those cults.
The Republican party is very like much a Cult.
Do not anger dear leader.
Only read the news that dear leader himself authorizes.
If others try to bring truth to the followers of the cult, the outsider must be shouted down or disproved or beaten or killed.
To refuse what dear leader says to do is a great insult to dear leader and then you must do something to get dear leaders forgiveness.

Cult followers will even risk their own well being to avoid displeasing dear leader. Also known as all the perks that the cult followers exist on, will be given away to a billionaire friend of dear leader and the perks that the cult followers live on will be gone. But the cult followers have been bred to be ignorant of their own wellbeing for dear leaders joy.


---------------------------------------------------------

Lastly......Analyze all the details on your so-called 'terrorists' that Canada caught(ViaRail Train).
Things are not as presented by your Rightwing Prime Minister.
Whats this weird thing of Iran Al Quada? People are questioning that very much as it does not fit Iran.
Harper does what the Republicans in the U.S. tell him. And as part of that, the Republicans in the U.S. do what Israel wants. Israel wants Iran nuked and all Iranian people to be killed in an act of genocide.
People in the Middle East are so tried of being murdered on a daily basis for control of 'oil'.
People in the Middle East are tired of the Christian terrorists(Rightwing war machine) who bring death to their lands.
The 3 main oil suppliers in the Middle East to the U.S. also manipulate things as well. They ignore their brothers of the land unless convenient for some task.
An unstable Middle East is a tormented Middle East.
There are two factions. Sunni and Shiite. Learn what each represents and then see the truth.

On North Korea....... An undernourished, poverty stricken country that wants all embargoes against it stopped. To join the free world they are threatening the free world in order to be invaded by the free world and then to get all the perks of a free rebuilding of Best Korea.

Just be glad a Centrist Left President(Obama) is President of North America. It is 5 less wars so far that the Republicans would of started and dragged your Canadian asses in too for the glory of the Rightwing war monger.


Read the book or watch the movie  1984 . Then realize that is the World you are forced to live in.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nineteen_Eighty-Four



------------------------------------------

Separation of church and State.

Religion has no place in politics.

Religious law shall never override the peoples law.

The Peoples law shall strive to protect those who are abused by religious law.

--------------------------------------------

school and sexual assault

Something that keeps popping up in the news.

Being raped/sexually assaulted in highschool or post secondary education.

Please do not go to the Principal. Call the police and then a rape kit will be done at the hospital and your attacker will face charges.
The Principal may have his own reasons to keep rape on/off school grounds a secret.

Please be aware that people are assholes and being raped may cause a need for you to leave town and home school the rest of your grade school years to avoid being a victim 20 times over.

For you see is that if your rapist is a sports star, the principal or university administrator or security guard may tell you to ignore it as it may ruin the sports career of your rapist.

The rapist may go on and continue to rape others as well as he has just gotten a free rape pass.

You can go straight to the hospital to report your rape and at least get the rape kit done before cleaning yourself up. A paper trail will then be started.

In the worst case scenario, the local police(obstruction of justice) may also try and stop you from reporting your rapist. You will then have to find a higher police force to press charges.
In the extra worst case scenario, the Prosecutor(obstruction of justice) will  ignore any crimes that happened and refuse to forward full charges to trial.
Do not allow yourself to be locked in a small room for many hours where the officers will force you to deny that you were raped, when you were truthfully raped.

Now what you may find disturbing is that not all rape victims are just women.
Some can be men who were violated in some type of hazing incident.
Or in some very odd cases, forced into a sexual act by threat of violence.

Rape is considered to be penetration of an orifice of the body, male or female.
Molestation can be charged for everything else.
Pictures of the rape/molestation being manufactured or distributed can amount to very serious charges when the victim is underage.
Do not let the legal system deny your truthful claim.

If a police officer is the one who raped/molested you under the guise of an arrest or search? Wow the crap you shall experience trying to get justice.

-------------------------

Being drunk off your ass does not allow you to consent to sex.
Especially when passed out or unaware of your surroundings, as multiple people rape/molest/video you.

--------------------------

Have you had to go to a training seminar about signs and actions of domestic abuse?

If your instructor says that all domestic abuse calls are caused by the man, well find a new instructor.
Unfortunately in some cases the attending police officer at a domestic abuse call will automatically arrest the male, who may or may not be there, without investigating the crime that may of happened.


Does either person have damage to their bodies?
Does the damage look self-inflicted?(does that cut from a thrown object have the underlying bruise to go with it).
Is the female claiming rape and then 100% refuses a rape kit to be done and under further questioning admits a false report because the sex was bad or he upset her.
Is the male nowhere to be found and eventually shows up claiming being blind stinking drunk the night before and can't remember a thing?
Does the female claim her pregnancy is the result of unprotected sex with the male, while the male claims he used a condom but she stole it and ran away immediately after consensual sex?

---------------------------------

One set of rules does not fit all situations.

Rights clean up the mess

Important life lesson: Laws and Rights don't protect you, they help clean up the mess.


Important life lesson: Laws and Rights don't protect you, they help clean up the mess.


Important life lesson: Laws and Rights don't protect you, they help clean up the mess.


Important life lesson: Laws and Rights don't protect you, they help clean up the mess.


 

what could go wrong with illegal laws

Did you ever wonder who the court ignoring person who created the unconstitutional drunk driving law was?

http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Architect+drunk+driver+steps+down/8176314/story.html
The architect of B.C’s controversial immediate roadside prohibition program for drunk drivers has stepped down as the province’s superintendent of motor vehicles, according to a statement from the justice ministry.
After six years, Steve Martin left the position Tuesday to help implement the government’s proposed Community Safety Act, Justice Minister Shirley Bond said in the statement.
Former RCMP superintendent and current ministry employee Sam MacLeod has replaced Martin,


Sorry for the crossed out word. It is something that is used when the media refuses to use the word 'criminal actions by the government/police/corporations'.

And now he is once again going to ignore the courts/police by working in a new agency where people can call it instead of the police.

In his new position, Martin will help implement the Community Safety Act. The act would allow people to report so-called crack shacks and other problem properties in their neighborhood to a new agency rather than police, according to justice minister and attorney general Shirley Bond.


 Call his agency and get a specialized mercenary team smashing down your neighbors doors and get their dog shot because you smelled a skunk and instantly think your neighbor is the biggest grow-op in the land.

But call him anyways and complain that someones dog pooped in your yard and you want DNA samples of every dog in the greater Vancouver area so you can get the dogs owner a $20 fine for trespassing or malicious pooping or failure to stoop and scoop.
As a side: If you want to stop peoples leashed dogs from pooping in your yard, you put bacon grease on the poop.  The owner/walker will then scream in shock as the dog eats the poop. And maybe next time he will stoop and scoop instead of "thats a good doggie".

The agency is probably going to do the investigations and then forward to the police, but then another legal issues pops up.....
Check out the laws in regards to 'private investigators'.
Oh the money you can make when someone starts stalking your residence or your person.
There will be interesting cases where the evidence presented in court shows illegalities in collection of that evidence that got your door smashed open.
ex: Who accessed your utilities billing information? Who took thermal readings of your home to see inside? Zoom lens visual images in your windows? Theres the garbage man, but your garbage is gone already??? So that wasn't some kid playing with that drone like helicopter hovering in your yard? Whats this strange thing that you found under your car body while servicing your car? Someone walking a dog really close to you and it seemed he directed the dog to sniff you??

Pay attention to the world around you, as you will see interesting things.


Steve Martin believes in instant punishment. No need for the courts and a Judge to rule you guilty.

“It’s behavioral intervention 101. It’s bringing the consequence to immediately follow the behavior,” Martin told The Sun’s Jonathan Fowlie. “The fact that these are immediate, they happen at the roadside, people lose their vehicles.”

This is just another way for the government to cut costs while ignoring proper legal procedure.

And ignoring your Rights to a fair trial before punishment.
Its one thing to be arrested for a crime, but its entirely another thing to be permanently punished on the spot for that crime without a Judge presiding over it, who will ensure that any justifiable laws broken by you or the officers are punished in a legal manner.


People used to instantly beat their kids too when the kid did something wrong. 
Those kids eventually ran away or turned to a life of rage against the system.
If you happen to take your child to the hospital for an injury, those questions they ask the child are for a specific reason.

The courts are there for a reason.

The officer presents his evidence to the Judge.


The defense challenges any discrepancies of that evidence.

Such as in the case of impaired driving:

Actual BAC number, which if the '''''screening'''' breathalyser does not have a number on it and only has colored lights, it can be challenged(calibration, etc) as it does not show a number. Even a numbered unit can be challenged.

Getting caught being a drunk driver with enough evidence for a punishment should always amount to an instant arrest and transport to the climate controlled breathalyser in the police station.
The Officer hopes really hard that the drunk does not puke in the police car. As that would entail calling in the cleaning staff and a car being out of service for awhile. But thats part of the job so quit resisting.
Occasionally there is a news report on an officer trying to charge a puker with obstruction of justice for the puke taking the car out of service. Then the Judge and or Prosecutor just laughs and says "No".

Once upon a time the drunk would stay in lockup until the next day to see the Judge and be granted bail for release. But thats expensive and your government does not like paying for justice.

Officers notes on any smell of alcohol or driver actions that are above the instant nervousness and any body issues that may cause an under-trained officer to call medical staggering as being 'drunk off ass'.

Of course there is also the legality of the roadblock, which is always illegal, but some Judge allows it for imagined safety.
To add, did the officer conduct an unlawful questioning or unlawful search of your vehicle through the window or direct search?
So you challenge to the Judge that the roadblock was setup to look for signs of crime instead of the intended drunks.  All that does is notify the Judge that the roadblock was not operating to mandated guidelines and will not reduce any punishment for you except in the case of a Judge reprimanding the officer for not complying with another Judges orders on particular protocols for roadblocks.

Never forgetting the delay to get your case heard in court, so unfortunately people will pay the extortion demand and try to ignore the true legal aspects of bowing down to corruption of the law.

A good person will challenge everything that appears to be a crime against them instead of cowering down in the corner afraid of being executed for speaking up.

Monetary hardship is used by corporations.
It is not something the government or the police or monopoly ICBC should be using.
Monetary hardship is defined as 'cash on the spot' and ignore any judicial protections.


---------------------------

Meanwhile the government keeps loosening alcohol restrictions for greater profit from taxes.

Tough on crime or an accessory to the crime?

-------------------------

Bicycle helmet laws...............

Lets see.....

Helmet law comes into effect.
Less people now riding bicycles.
Accident numbers are still the same as before the helmet law.
More people are actually crashing due to the immunity from thinking that the helmet provides to them.
Those that implemented the law pick apart the statistics to fraudulently show that helmets work to prevent something or another.
Police get more frustrated at bicycle riders who ignore all traffic laws due to the helmet preventing thinking from happening.

---------------------------

So is anyone challenging the unconstitutional toll road tickets yet?
Toll ticket = traffic ticket = wheres the dispute section on the back of the ticket that gets sent to the court system to challenge a fraudulent ticket?
In house arbitration is not legal as per the definition of an Arbitrator who is to be a mutually agreed upon third party without any ties to either client.
Monopoly ICBC denying your renewals of your license or insurance is a conflict of interest as they are an insurance company.... Who have been given full control of all aspects of the roads/driving system in BC.

 Oh and if the government says its a private company running the toll system?
Challenge ownership of the road.
It is a public roadway, so how can a private company ignore the laws of public roadways?
Or is there a teeny tiny 'private property' sign hiding in the grass of the shoulder of the toll gates?

-----------------------------------

When o when is a politician going to jail for his crimes.
When o when will the sheeple scream.
You just got mugged by an illegal law.
Your challenge court date is in 2 or 3 years.
BooHooBooHooBooHoo.

yet another challenge to instant convictions

This is really getting to be ridiculous.

Your government in their quest to avoid using the expense of the court system, keeps making police officers Judge, Jury, Executioner.

Basically, people are still being convicted based on the breathalyser screening device.

"Screening" is the key word. The handheld unit is meant as a quick test for components of alcohol, which if it shows positive, then results in an arrest and transport to the station to use the climate controlled unit, that is fully calibrated and gives a fully documented readout for the coming court proceedings.

'Components of alcohol'. Basically if gases from your stomach rise up, well you are now convicted.
Acid reflux is a basic medical condition that will skew a test. Occasionally residue in your mouth will also cause a false reading. The residue being alcohol based mouth wash or some type of foods.

If the handheld unit that was used on you has only lights and no numbers, it can be considered to be unadmissible in court. Which is of course why the court equation is removed from the whole proceedings.
You may remember back when the government changed the minimum reading for '24 hour suspension'. .05bac to .06bac. Which only half the machines had been recalibrated on their warning levels.

If your machine has numbers on it. You can question how the machine deals with temperature differences and humidity levels.
The makers of the devices may refuse to release full details of the machine, using the generic terms of business secrets. Which is basically saying that the machine has flaws and they will fight to prevent the Judge from seeing those flaws. Which is actually obstruction of justice in the eyes of the law.
So if more people push this narrative, the machines will either be fixed, or seen as only a screening device that its readings are not court admissible, or banned entirely.

Basically the in-house unit should have full documentation on its servicing levels from the day it was put into service.
Many years ago the BAC vans were decommissioned due to temperature variations that resulted in skewed readings.  Many people convicted before that realization though.

-----------------

http://bccla.org/news/2013/03/bc-court-of-appeal-to-hear-challenge-to-bcs-drinking-and-driving-law/
BC Court of Appeal to hear challenge to BC’s drinking and driving law
Posted on March 17, 2013

Vancouver – The BC Court of Appeal will hear arguments on March 18-20, 2013 in Chisholm, et al. v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles). The Court will consider whether changes to B.C.’s drinking and driving law are constitutional.

In 2010, the government changed B.C.’s drinking and driving law. Under the new law, a driver who blows a “warn” or a “fail” on the roadside screening device will face automatic penalties. Penalties will also apply if a driver does not give a breath sample. The penalties include a driving ban, having the car seized, paying fines and fees to have the driver’s license returned, to tow the car and for storage.

Drivers who had either blown a “fail” or who had not given a breath sample challenged the law in 2011. The BC Supreme Court found that the law was unconstitutional only as it applied to drivers who blew a “fail.” The Court said that the law violated the Charter of Rights and Freedoms because there was no way for drivers to properly challenge the roadside breath test.

In May 2012, the government changed the law again. Now, police must tell drivers that they can ask for a second test on a different machine. The police must also tell drivers that they can ask for a review of the test through the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles.

The BCCLA is an intervener in this case. The BCCLA will argue that the drinking and driving law has a penal impact on drivers. Therefore, it violates the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty.

The BCCLA is represented by Claire Hunter and Eileen Patel of Hunter Litigation Chambers.

------------------

So basically,  anything that the police or government does that blocks you from direct challenge in court is unconstitutional.
Blowing in another unit had better be a ride to the station, no matter how many miles or hours away, to do a second reading. Why would you blow into another handheld unit that can have the same flaw as the first.
Officers may get angry at having to officially arrest you to take you to the station. But Rights are Rights. If you committed a crime, then proper procedures must be done. Also known as proper evidence gathering that is 100% admissible in a court of law.
Drunk or sober, the legal systems protections of people must be adhered too.
The court case may be two or three years away, but thats what happens when the government underfunds the court system.
Make sure to counter any false evidence the officer may give(seems that some officers do lie in court and the court doesn't penalize them), but if your case is in three years, ask for a dismissal, due to delay of due process. Plus being reimbursed moneys that you have spent in the delay along with hardships and collection of defense evidence for your case.
Don't be a victim twice.

A further thought: Should you notice that the officers from the start of their stopping and interrogating you are doing things that can be construed as abuse of the law..... file charges or a lawsuit against them personally. The law is meant to protect, but those who swear to uphold the law can also abuse the law as they have weapons and you are filthy scum.
Do the same tactics as the police and government. Ask the Judge to have the officer forfeit his police/personal car for part payment from their abuse of you.
The amount of stolen property by the government/police is getting ridiculous. [definition:: stolen: property that is tagged as being proceeds of crime without evidence or property that is auctioned off due to failure to pay unjust fines. People are not always able to fight the confiscation which results in the abuse of justice.]
But that would mean that the law applies equally to all people at once, with no exemptions, which is what the police and government hide behind.
What use is a legal system where it is only applied against the civilian and not applied against the oppressing police force.

Consider the way that the police use roadblocks for looking for signs of crime, even though a Judge has ruled that only traffic offense questions can be asked, but you are being treated and interrogated and searched as criminal number one. Disobey the barked orders and be cited for obstructing an officer in his pursuit of abusing the basics of law.
http://bccla.org/news/2003/08/surrey-roadblocks-violate-charter/



Consider something that the court system is not really hearing either.... ICBC(monopoly, insurance corporation of british columbia) is overstepping the bounds of being an insurance agent, as they have been given full control over every aspect of driving in British Columbia.
This results in them banning insurance renewals and banning drivers license renewals based on allegations.
Were you convicted of a driving crime, in a court of law? Basically you could be denied products from ICBC via a roadside conviction. Your vehicle that your family uses is now a lawn ornament until ICBC says otherwise. Your drivers license is banned until ICBC says otherwise.
Didn't pay a ticket by its expiry date? In a proper judicial system, an officer would show up with either an arrest warrant or a court subpoena for you to explain to the Judge why you didn't pay.
Basically ICBC is saying you are convicted on the spot without any court sanctioned order.
And that is abuse of the legal system.
It is also obstruction of justice as they avoid the courts in as many ways as possible.
The government does this to avoid court costs. Which is basically obstruction/destruction of justice.

But who will be the first to file a mega lawsuit against the person who is the Minister responsible for driving/police at the time?
Sure would be nice to see the politician sentenced to 30 years in prison.
But they will claim exemption from your laws.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

courts allow police to lie

As North Americas court system is continuously destroyed in order for profit or cost savings, strange things start showing up in the news.

Courts that state that the police are allowed to lie(commit false information to the record) in court or on the streets, in order to do stuff.

https://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/03/opinion/sunday/why-police-officers-lie-under-oath.html?pagewanted=1&_r=3&pagewanted=all&


What stuff?

Lets say that the local quota for tickets is low. In this scenario drug offense tickets are low. Now in order to pump up the numbers, the police strangely keep smelling marijuana everywhere. Not really everywhere, but you know the drill. An officer pulls you over for that blinking tail light. Not the turn signal, but that never to be replicated short that causes your tail light to flicker only when a police officer is behind you. He comes up to your window and he really isn't trying to write you a ticket for the imaginary short. He may write a warning ticket. He will then state that he smells marijuana. He then attempts via bullying tactics to force a physical search of your vehicle. And by force, we mean, 'obstruction of justice' for refusing the unlawful search when obviously the officer only pulled you over to conduct an unlawful search. He already did a visual search from outside the vehicle as he walked up. He even ran your plates to see if there is any notes on the registered owners file.

***

Roadblocks do the same thing. Force the stop of all vehicles under the imaginary excuse of it being for drunk drivers, when in reality he is stopping vehicles to conduct unlawful searches. Visual search first. Then unlawful interrogation. Then if he doesn't like you stating your Rights and Freedoms, he will force you to the side of the road in a hostage type of situation. Some Judge(or his government handlers) said the police for absolutely no reason can keep you hostage on the side of the road for 15 minutes. But in real law, the officer is breaking the law. Always remember that you committed no crime to be stopped in the first place.


***


You are walking down the street. An officer stops you as he passes by you, due to a smell of something that is imaginary. He then tries to force an unlawful search of you. If you refuse the search? He may beat you(resisting arrest as no witness's are around). He may kill you(no witness's are around). He may get roid rage and cuff you and take you to the station for your not allowing his unlawful search of you. At the station he may rape you.  The usual charge of obstruction of justice, even though no justice was necessary at the time. In some cities(New York as one) officers will carry little baggies of drugs. They then conduct unlawful searches on certain targets(generally Black people) and the unlawful search finds a little baggie of drugs. The basic bag is marijuana. Another bag is cocaine. It all depends on who the victim is and how many months the officer wants them in jail for.


***


Speeding tickets quotas are for revenue. Funny thing is while the police are writing traffic tickets, all sorts of crimes are happening. But that takes more work to enforce so screw that. Rainy weather will restrict the police from writing traffic tickets. But as soon as the rain stops, oh look at the massive amount of speed traps in use.


***


So you were just at the bulk food store and have some baggies of various spices and herbs. You get stopped by an officer for whatever made up reason. He sees the baggies of herbs and starts conducting a drug investigation. Long story short. You have just spent 2 months in prison as the so-called drug lab never tested your herbs and the lab attendant just wrote on the paperwork 'marijuana'.
But you can make a nice sum of money suing the government/police/lab for falsifying information, incompetence, malicious prosecution and false arrest.


***


Here is yet another example of  'drug bust quotas before brains'. Yet another flawed investigation that was based on either extremely flawed information or the reality may be that the officers got a tip from an anonymous source and got together some of the officers to have some fun breaking stuff.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/01/raid-of-the-day_n_2568491.html?utm_hp_ref=the-agitator
Billings, Montana police say the 6 am raid they conducted in October 2012 was part of an investigation into a suspected meth lab. But there was no meth lab. And the 12-year-old daughter of Jackie Fasching suffered severe burns after the SWAT team used a broomstick to drop a flash grenade through a window into a bedroom where the girl and her sister were sleeping.....
...As for the flash grenade, Fasching said it “blew the nails out of the drywall." There's also the matter of why, if they were looking for a meth lab, the police would have set off flash grenades in the first place. Meth labs are known to explode.....
.....Except that they were looking for a meth lab, and didn’t find it. And they weren't aware of the children permanently living in the home they claim to have thoroughly investigated. Clearly something went wrong.....

For those of you who have never seen what a meth lab explosion looks like, picture a empty lot where a house was 5 seconds before.


***


Drug sniffing dogs. Oh boy. Mainly used to violate peoples rights. Drug dogs are not 100% positive in their reaction to certain smells. Police officers will even manipulate(tug the leash) the dogs to make the dog 'sit' which is what the dog does to say 'I found something'. An officer tugging the leash is called 'obstructing an officer in his duty'. But you never noticed the tug and you stupidly allowed the dog to sniff your person or vehicle by graciously accepting the officers 'dog training' exercise offer.
http://bccla.org/news/2013/01/bccla-to-argue-at-supreme-court-of-canada-on-appropriate-use-of-sniffer-dogs/
Posted on January 21, 2013

Ottawa – The BCCLA will be appearing at the Supreme Court of Canada on Tuesday, January 22, 2013, to argue in R. v. Chehil and R. v. MacKenzie. These cases concern sniffer dogs and whether the current standards permitting their use are consistent with the right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. Mr. Chehil’s baggage was selected for a sniffer dog search based on the fact that he was a solo traveler flying on an overnight flight from Vancouver to Halifax, had purchased a one-way ticket at the airport, and checked one piece of relatively new luggage. Mr. MacKenzie’s car was searched by a sniffer dog after he was stopped for speeding and aroused police suspicion because, among other things, he appeared to be nervous and was traveling from Calgary to Regina along the TransCanada Highway.

In the context of searches by police, s. 8 of the Charter has long been understood to require “reasonable and probable grounds” – reasonable grounds to believe that evidence of a crime would be discovered through the search. In 2008, however, the Supreme Court of Canada adopted a “reasonable suspicion” standard for using sniffer dogs, lowering the police’s burden to justify the search. The BCCLA is an intervener in these cases, and argues that the “reasonable and probable grounds” standard applied to all other investigative searches by the police should also govern the use of sniffer dogs.


***

Why do courts keep allowing such travesties of justice to continue?

Corruption corrupts absolutely and for the courts and the government to start making things 100% legal now, would amount to such a large amount of money spent with an outside investigation firm to start arresting and prosecuting officers and prosecutors, the courts keep trying to pretend corruption does not exist.
Its all part of that saying that people say, "I'll be dead when the this situation becomes critical, so I don't care, so let the next generation deal with it."
'Let the next generation deal with it', is how big oil/coal/gas operates. Who cares if the planet is destroyed in the greed.



------------------------------------------------------------

Ok morons. You still are glued to the idiot box for your news. You actually believe everything that the media spews out. You are being lied to. You are stupid and are nothing but a slave to corporations and the military/industrial complex.
War is profitable to some companies who own politicians.


http://www.opednews.com/articles/Western-Media-Ratcheting-U-by-Soraya-Sepahpour-U-130124-762.html
On November 22, 2012, the Los Angeles Times published an alarming piece of news entitled " Cyber Corps program trains spies for the digital age ". The "cyber-warriors" who are headed for organizations such as the CIA, NSC, FBI, the Pentagon and so on, are trained to stalk, " rifle through trash, sneak a tracking device on cars and plant false information on Facebook.   They also are taught to write computer viruses, hack digital networks, crack passwords, plant listening devices and mine data from broken cellphones and flash drives."

In light of such wide spread propaganda, deception and digital warfare by the Pentagon, and with the recent Los Angeles Times revelations of the Cyber Corps training, truth become indistinguishable from falsehood......


***

The U.S. is getting a new Defense secretary. He is very much hated by the war machine. He could be classified as a peace lover. No need to rush into a war.
Israel detests him, as he won't be one to nuke Iran on behalf of Israel.
http://mondoweiss.net/2013/02/israel-hagel-hearing.html
“The emphasis on Israel and Iran – which, in American politics, has become for the most part an Israel issue – demonstrates that the senators were far less concerned with the strategic questions that the secretary of defense should be focused on and much more interested in trying to defeat a nominee who has strayed from political orthodoxy, especially on issues related to Israel,” he told IPS.

Why does the Canadian government support the genocide of the people of Iran, by either Israel or Israels employees in the U.S. government?
When the nukes are dropped(either Israeli's own nukes or U.S. nukes), please enjoy the nuclear fallout in North America. You probably have at least 3-6 days(depending on the season) to loudly bitch at your governments for the genocide.
George W. Bush murdered at least a half million people in his tirades to avenge his father over the capture and execution of a former U.S. employee(Saddam Husein). Which is why George is a wanted man for his 'crimes against humanity'. Canada is an accessory to harboring that fugitive during his trips to Canada, but your media ignores that.


*

Iran allows International nuclear inspectors in.
Israel refuses to allow International nuclear inspectors in.


***

Has your dictator Prime Minister Stephen Harper removed your 'truth in news casting laws' yet?
Can you imagine all the propaganda that Canada can spew out, just like FoxNews....
Saint Ronald Reagan removed his countries truth in news laws. Without that happening, FoxNews would not be the Rightwing republican propaganda machine that it is.
And with the rightwing derp from Foxnews, it has dragged down all other news sources to be nothing but bottom feeders who rely on ratings more than actual news.


***


AlJazeera is pretty good news source. Live news streams. In-depth reporting.

http://www.aljazeera.com/

Funny thing. AlJazeera bought Former U.S. Vice President Al Gores current TV.  The rightwing then staged yet another propaganda fest. Some cable TV companies instantly canceled the channel(current TV).
North America is afraid of real news.
Real news points out the corruption in this world.
Real news calls torture, torture.
Real news calls genocide, genocide.



-------------------------------------------------------------


When you do drop the nukes and commit genocide, please keep your radiation fallout in your northern hemisphere. We'd really appreciate that.


--------------------------------------------------------------

So next on the agenda. Torture never gets any information about terrorism. Yet you keep people hostage in Gitmo for decades until they die. Death from either old age, suicide or torture.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-34222_162-57567347-10391739/panetta-enhanced-interrogation-did-not-lead-to-bin-laden/
Panetta went on to say that there was at least some truth to the notion that enhanced interrogation was part of the hunt for bin Laden.

"Yes, some of it came from some of the tactics that were used at that time, interrogation tactics that were used," he admitted. "But the fact is we put together most of that intelligence without having to resort to that."

NBC's Chuck Todd followed up: "And you think you could have gotten it without any?"

Panetta replied: "I think we could have gotten bin Laden without that."

Torture. Torture. Torture. Torture.

Canada over the years has even deported people to be tortured.


---------------------------------------------------------

Interesting article. People in power(glory pigs) really hate it when you keep stating your Rights and Freedoms.
Lets look at types of speech...
Free speech.
Hate speech.
Truthful speech.
Lying sack of shit speech.
For all of you venomous Tea Party members in Canada.. 'Hate speech' and 'lying sack of shit speech' is not 'protected speech', so enjoy you time in jail. The RCMP is monitoring all your daily rantings on your rightwing message boards. They get so tired of all your shit. You live in a echo chamber where you refuse to see truth and instead concentrate of believing all the propaganda that is targeted at closed minds that are free from individual thought.
One day you will even have some news reporters, oh wait, I mean 'commentators who spew rightwing propaganda' on certain networks, jailed too.

http://bccla.org/news/2013/02/bccla-challenges-laughable-ban-on-free-speech-about-free-speech-by-prince-rupert-school-board/
 BCCLA challenges “laughable” ban on free speech by Prince Rupert school board
Posted on February 4, 2013

Unconstitutional school board ban on t-shirts displaying Charter of Rights descends into farce

VANCOUVER – The BCCLA is calling on the Prince Rupert School District (No. 052) to reverse its ban on teachers wearing t-shirts displaying section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the provision that protects free speech. The t-shirts display the Shakespeare-inspired question “2(b) or not 2(b)?” on the front, and the text of section 2 of the Charter on the back: 2(a) freedom of religion, 2(b) freedom of expression, 2(c) freedom of peaceful assembly, and 2(d) freedom of association.

The BCCLA argues that the ban on these t-shirts is a violation of the constitutional right to free speech displayed on the t-shirt itself. Freedom of expression guarantees the rights of speakers and listeners alike. In banning these shirts, the School District has violated both the teachers’ and students’ rights to learn, think and talk about their fundamental freedoms.

“The school district’s decision to ban free speech about free speech reminds us of a badly-written comedy sketch. But this isn’t an Air Farce skit, it’s a troubling violation of teachers’ constitutional right to free expression,” said Lindsay Lyster, President of the BCCLA. “The School District has an obligation to respect free speech, and there is no lawful justification for the District to ban these t-shirts.”

As a government body, School District No. 052 is bound by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, including the guarantee of freedom of expression and freedom of association. Governments can only limit such rights in a narrow range of circumstances, according to legal tests established by the Supreme Court of Canada.

Lyster added that the ban on these t-shirts is contrary to the principle that schools should be places for open discussion and inquiry: “Banning these t-shirts seems to be short-sighted attempt to cut off discussion and thinking about the basic constitutional rights that the t-shirts display. We assume that this ban has provoked a lot of discussion among Prince Rupert students. Unfortunately, the District has provided an example of a government violating the constitutional rights for its students to discuss, rather than the better example of a government respecting those rights.”

***

As an extra note:  If you send your kids to a private school? Read the contract. There should be a section on 'punishments for your child'. Just because you give permission for the school to beat, oh wait I mean discipline your child, doesn't make it legal.

 

z

 You know how bankers are totally destroying people and not being prosecuted and jailed for life for their crimes?

How the Justice department is driving people to bankruptcy or suicide.

How the justice department refuses to jail those who destroyed the World economies by their incessant greed.

Police officers should never be immune from the law.

Prosecutors should never be immune from the law(Charge is: obstruction of justice, by refusing to file all charges and filed in a way that one charge thrown out does not nullify the whole case).

Airport security guards(TSA) should never be immune from the law.

The military should never be immune from the law(in any country).

How known war criminals like George W. Bush and Dick Cheney continue to travel to your Canada without being jailed and extradited to the World courts on charges of  'crimes against humanity'.

How politicians continue to submit unconstitutional laws at the request of greedy mother fuckers.

How politicians continue to submit unconstitutional laws at the request of prohibitionists.

When a politician writes up and submits and puts into law a unconstitutional bill designed to take away the Constitutional Rights of the people, the politician must be prosecuted and jailed for their crime. Premiers and Prime Ministers and Governors and Presidents and Congressmen and Senators and Mayors and Councilmen and even rulers of condo boards and HOA's, are never to be exempt from the justifiable laws.
In Canada and the U.S. there are a few from just the past 2 years that should be serving life sentences in Prison. Sorry Obama, but you extended martial law so thats life in prison or else you can repeal martial law. Harper(martial law, treason for implementing Bush jr's martial law), Toews(internet censorship), are also life sentences. The list goes on and on.

When a politician says: "I don't need to submit my bill to a constitutional lawyer before implementing it", they are guilty of a crime. Case in point: BC's drink driving law(Campbell/Clark + their minions/ministers) that worked to give the police the power of a Judge in order to give an instant guilty judgment on the roadside, while also blocking access to the courts for disputing the Constitutional crime committed by the police officers.
The drink driving law was declared a violation of the charter(unconstitutional). As a matter of fact, the police stopping your innocent vehicle and your innocent ass is a violation of the charter. Some Judge allowed the violation for safety, but the interrogation part violates the charter. But the stop still violates many more Rights than the lame excuse of safety bullshit.
http://bccla.org/news/2003/08/surrey-roadblocks-violate-charter/


When a company keeps committing crimes? Their CEO's and whoever is the number one boss/owner of the organization should be prosecuted with a prison sentence as part judgment. Throw in a few employees as well for their part in the criminal schemes.

---- -- ---  - - - - - - - - - - - -

 The hacker-activist group Anonymous hijacked the website of the U.S. Sentencing Commission to avenge the death of Aaron Swartz, an Internet activist who committed suicide due to being persecuted for obtaining what should of been 100% free and 100% open information.

----

Citizens of the world,
Anonymous has observed for some time now the trajectory of justice in the United States with growing concern. We have marked the departure of this system from the noble ideals in which it was born and enshrined. We have seen the erosion of due process, the dilution of constitutional rights, the usurpation of the rightful authority of courts by the "discretion" of prosecutors. We have seen how the law is wielded less and less to uphold justice, and more and more to exercise control, authority and power in the interests of oppression or personal gain."

-----

Lets add you people of Canada as well. You are definitely not a free sovereign nation, as you are made to bend to the will of the United States and all the trolls that seek to destroy the people in the name of ultimate massive greedy profit.

The supreme, absolute, and uncontrollable power by which an independent state is governed and from which all specific political powers are derived; the intentional independence of a state, combined with the right and power of regulating its internal affairs without foreign interference.
  
---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----

New York to introduce new scanners to aim at people walking down the sidewalk in order to conduct an unlawful search.
https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nypd-readies-scan-and-frisk-article-1.1245663
The New York Civil Liberties Union last year raised concerns about “virtual pat downs,” and some security experts have said false positives could lead to unjustified stops.

So please pick up your new metal civil liberty cards that are in the shape of a gun. So when the police scan and stop you, you can make $5000 in the easy to prosecute lawsuit against them.

If everyone were to sue the police? The police would be bankrupted and therefor more encouraged to stop violating the peoples Rights and Freedoms.